CHAPTER 1.14
8 Eight is the mark of the one that has the faculty of to orientate itself according to the eternal will of God. It is not the symbol of the belief, but is the symbol of the one that is in the man for whose Javhč arranges that is done the will its since who speaks with its tongue is elected it that God has. It is not a common symbol, but sole, for that elected has it in himself every well and all God has place in he since this man recognized what ever not any man can recognize in himself. What it has the faculty of to arrange of this symbol is elected sent off it, since who can recognize God in himself if who has not God for oneself. There is not men that possano a lot if not men of God, that have the power of itself in everything to have what desire for all. What the man does not recognize is recognized from the elected, since who has God in himself is elected it that God It has. All what God arranges for the man is its well. Everything that the man desires is God. Every man considers that of whom needs. Not not not the needs of the man are born from its desires and the desires of the man are the resources that the man has for oneself and that does succeed to gain if with the weakness of its passionate conduct for all that of whom arranges and that knows to recognize that like short enjoyment to its desider. Everything that the man wants is its participation to the ephemeral enjoyment of its necessity of possession, for that this man approves like suitable what provokes addiction to its desires. The matrix of the imposition of a such behavior is to consider in the tried again intensive activity, in the man, to communicate its desires to all those who can contribute to the achievement of such purpose. So the man has direct participation to its total imposition for the conclusion of a such assertion of its desires for its needs, for whose every attempt of to change or to arrest a such conduct provokes in the man an instinctive reaction, that the grievous attorney's office astrazioni, outside from the rationality, for that he it is opposed to the assertion of every thing that hoops of to change its achievement. So the man not only hostile é to every activity that you obstruct the route established, but it is opposed aggressively, to every opposition to gain a such emotional activity, for that he it is left entirely to himself enjoy of every condition, that provoke an adaptation, also I summon, in such affettivitą. It not the man is able, rationally, itself to this condition to that is bound from its activity mental, since every show of the emotional one towards the actual desires is condition privileged to itself personally to every obstacle, for whose every desire suppressed produces a progressive deterioration of the emotional passivity towards what is wanted for whose every capacity intellettiva comes obscured from the instinctive predisposition to the. If this is the routine followed from the man that does not recognize this its limit and that produces in it every shape of astrazione from the abstract faculty in the reality lived, this does not be able that to consider quite little of everything what could have, not only for oneself same, for that he will be able alone to produce in the men a well-known availability to the possessione of the lived against a well-known one. The difference between these two assertions is in the entire availability of an alone one of is at the consequent orientation a final condition of eccelsa reception of every possible assertion of eccelsa industry of the to become in the to live Beyond what it has been, for whose every desire yielded since the need is the bramositą of to recognize itself for what is itself and not for what it is had, for that every abuse of indifferent opposite assertion is changed in obscene industry declined in the common exterior appearance and end to what is had.