| |
8 Eight is
the mark of the one that has the faculty of to orientate itself
according to the eternal will of God. It is not the symbol of the
belief, but is the symbol of the one that is in the man for whose Javhč
arranges that is done the will its since who speaks with its tongue is
elected it that God has. It is not a common symbol, but sole, for that
elected has it in himself every well and all God has place in he since
this man recognized what ever not any man can recognize in himself.
What it has the faculty of to arrange of this symbol is elected sent off
it, since who can recognize God in himself if who has not God for
oneself. There is not men that possano a lot if not men of God, that
have the power of itself in everything to have what desire for all.
What the man does not recognize is recognized from the elected, since
who has God in himself is elected it that God It has. All what God arranges for the man is its well.
Everything that the man desires is God. Every man considers that of
whom needs. Not not not the needs of the man are born from its desires
and the desires of the man are the resources that the man has for
oneself and that does succeed to gain if with the weakness of its
passionate conduct for all that of whom arranges and that knows to
recognize that like short enjoyment to its desider. Everything that the
man wants is its participation to the ephemeral enjoyment of its
necessity of possession, for that this man approves like suitable what
provokes addiction to its desires. The matrix of the imposition of a
such behavior is to consider in the tried again intensive activity, in
the man, to communicate its desires to all those who can contribute to
the achievement of such purpose. So the man has direct participation to
its total imposition for the conclusion of a such assertion of its
desires for its needs, for whose every attempt of to change or to arrest
a such conduct provokes in the man an instinctive reaction, that the
grievous attorney's office astrazioni, outside from the rationality, for
that he it is opposed to the assertion of every thing that hoops of to
change its achievement. So the man not only hostile é to every activity
that you obstruct the route established, but it is opposed
aggressively, to every opposition to gain a such emotional activity, for
that he it is left entirely to himself enjoy of every condition, that
provoke an adaptation, also I summon, in such affettivitą. It not the
man is able, rationally, itself to this condition to that is bound from
its activity mental, since every show of the emotional one towards the
actual desires is condition privileged to itself personally to every
obstacle, for whose every desire suppressed produces a progressive
deterioration of the emotional passivity towards what is wanted for
whose every capacity intellettiva comes obscured from the instinctive
predisposition to the. If this is the routine followed from the man
that does not recognize this its limit and that produces in it every
shape of astrazione from the abstract faculty in the reality lived, this
does not be able that to consider quite little of everything what could
have, not only for oneself same, for that he will be able alone to
produce in the men a well-known availability to the possessione of the
lived against a well-known one. The difference between these two
assertions is in the entire availability of an alone one of is at the
consequent orientation a final condition of eccelsa reception of every
possible assertion of eccelsa industry of the to become in the to live
Beyond what it has been, for whose every desire yielded since the need
is the bramositą of to recognize itself for what is itself and not for
what it is had, for that every abuse of indifferent opposite assertion
is changed in obscene industry declined in the common exterior
appearance and end to what is had. |
|